On September
17, 2003, the City Council unanimously adopted
the Department of City Planning’s rezoning
proposal encompassing 120 blocks in North Corona,
Community District 3, Queens. This followed approval
by the community board on May 15, by the Borough
President on June 20 and by the City Planning
Commission on July 23, 2003 ( read
the CPC Report).
The approved changes, the first comprehensive
revision
of
the area’s
zoning since 1961, are the result of more than
a decade of close consultation with Community
District 3, especially its Land Use Committee,
the Queens Borough President’s Office and
its Zoning Task Force.
The North Corona rezoning is bounded by 32nd
Avenue / Astoria Boulevard on the north, 114th
Street on the east, Roosevelt Avenue on the south,
and on the west, the boundary is defined by a
stepped line of north - south running streets
beginning at 89th Street at Roosevelt Avenue and
ending at the intersection of 93rd Street at 32nd
Avenue.
Existing Land
Use and Neighborhood Character
North Corona is mostly a residential community
(see Land Use Map). The widely varied residential
building types reflect North Corona’s historical
development patterns, beginning with its origin
as the village of West Flushing in 1854 and its
early growth concentrated south of Roosevelt Avenue
along the then recently completed Long Island
Rail Road. After World War I, completion of the
#7 IRT “el” on Roosevelt Avenue stimulated
higher-density residential development in North
Corona. Walk-up and elevator apartment buildings
were constructed in the 1920's and 30's on blocks
west of Junction Boulevard. To the east, closely
spaced one- and two-family residences were built
on relatively narrow lots next to larger parcels
with detached, one-family homes of the earlier
era.
Development in the decades after the Second World
War was typified by the "tower-in-the-park" apartment
houses built along the northeastern and western
edges of the rezoning area. The few, scattered
residential developments built since then have
not addressed the need for new housing spurred
by a dramatic increase in population over the
last decade. Moreover, the areas zoning, virtually
unchanged since 1961, did not reflect existing
residential building types, thereby allowing
new
development that did not fit in with the prevailing
neighborhood character.
|